Code360 powered by Coding Ninjas X Naukri.com. Code360 powered by Coding Ninjas X Naukri.com
Table of contents
1.
Introduction
2.
Software Reliability
3.
Reliability Metrics
4.
Types of Reliability Metrics
5.
Software Failure Mechanisms
6.
Types of Software Failures
7.
FAQs
8.
Key Takeaways 
Last Updated: Mar 27, 2024

Software Reliability and Failure Mechanisms

Author Pankhuri Goel
0 upvote

Introduction

Software Reliability is the level of software quality that assures that the software's performance is consistent and credible. This also guarantees that the software's precision is relatively high, almost to the point of flawless.

When a user feels that the software is no longer delivering the desired outcome concerning the specified input values, this is known as a software failure. Depending on the degree of the failures, such as catastrophic, critical, significant, or minor, the user may need to classify them as catastrophic, critical, major, or minor.

Software Reliability

Software reliability is synonymous with operational reliability. It is defined as a system's or component's ability to perform its required functions under static conditions for a set amount of time.

Software reliability is sometimes described as the likelihood that a software system will complete its assigned task in a particular environment for a predetermined number of input cases, assuming error-free hardware and input.

Software reliability, along with functionality, usability, performance, serviceability, capability, installability, maintainability, and documentation, is a vital component of software quality. Software reliability is difficult to accomplish due to the increasing complexity of software. While any system containing software with a high degree of complexity will be difficult to reach a particular level of reliability, system developers tend to push complexity into the software layer, owing to the rapid expansion of system size and ease of upgrading the program.

For example, sizeable next-generation aviation will have over 1 million source lines of software onboard; next-generation air traffic control systems will have between one and two million lines. Also, the upcoming International Space Station will have over two million lines on board and over 10 million lines of ground support software, and several significant life-critical defence systems will have over 5 million source lines. While software complexity is inversely connected to software reliability, it is directly related to other essential aspects of software quality, such as functionality, capability, etc.

Reliability Metrics

The reliability of a software product is measured quantitively using Reliability Metrics. The choice of the metric to employ is determined by the sort of system to which it applies and the application domain's needs.

We don't have a solid grasp of the nature of software, so measuring software reliability is difficult. Finding an appropriate approach to quantify software reliability and most of the variables related to program reliability is tough. Even software estimations do not have a standard definition. If we can't evaluate dependability directly, we can measure anything that resembles the characteristics of reliability.

Also see,  V Model in Software Engineering

Types of Reliability Metrics

There are four types of software reliability measurement methods currently available:

  1. Product Metrics:
    The metrics used to create the artefact, such as requirement specification documents, system design documents, and so on, are known as product metrics. These metrics aid in determining whether a product is adequate by keeping track of aspects such as usability, reliability, maintainability, and portability. These metrics are taken from the source code's original body.
     
  2. Project Management Metrics:
    Project metrics define the features and execution of a project. If the programmer manages the project appropriately, we can produce better results. The ability to accomplish tasks on schedule and within the desired quality standards are linked to the development process. When developers adopt ineffective methods, costs rise. A stronger development process, risk management process, and configuration management process can all help to improve reliability.
     
  3. Process Metrics:
    It quantifies the relevant characteristics of the software development process and its surroundings. They can identify if a process runs well since they report on metrics like cycle time and rework time. The objective of a process metric is to complete the process correctly the first time around. The technique has a direct impact on the product's quality. As a result, process metrics can be used to anticipate, monitor, and enhance software's reliability and quality. Process metrics describe the performance and quality of the software product's operations.
     
  4. Fault and Failure Metrics:
    A fault is a flaw in a program that emerges when the programmer makes an error and causes the program to fail when run under certain conditions. The failure-free execution software is determined using these metrics. 

    Several errors discovered during testing and failures or other issues reported by users after delivery are gathered, summarised and analysed to accomplish this goal. Failure metrics are based on customer feedback on bugs discovered after the software was released. As a result, the failure data gathered is used to calculate failure density, Mean Time To Failures (MTTF), and other variables that can be used to quantify or predict software reliability.

Software Failure Mechanisms

The existence of faults in the software causes software failure. However, software defects do not always imply that the system will fail. System failures are critical, and their recovery is expensive because they sometimes harm software and the hardware, and in the worst-case scenario, the hardware is entirely destroyed. However, not every software failure leads to a situation like this, but many do. Also, if the program fails to meet the user requirements that it was designed to fulfil, it is labelled a software failure.

Bugs, ambiguities, oversights, or misinterpretations of the software's criteria are supposed to meet cause software failure. Carelessness or incompetence in writing code, insufficient testing, inappropriate or unanticipated software usage, or other unforeseen problems can also be the reason for software failure.

As a result, software failures were categorised to ascertain their hardware behaviour and features, such as whether or not they were recoverable.

Recommended Reading: Software Engineering

Types of Software Failures

We categorise software failures into five categories:

  1. Transient failure
    Only specific input values result in transient software failures. These values often fall outside the system's acceptable range, resulting in system failure. As a result, the program is checked for both acceptable and erroneous inputs during testing to ensure that the software's behaviour and reliability are examined. Thus, such scenarios are avoided to the maximum extent possible.
     
  2. Permanent failure:
    All input values are affected by this type of software failure. In such circumstances, an error-prone function is invoked via internal calling, and the error in it causes the failure. Infinite loops in the function, for example, lead the system to carry added strain, which results in complete system failure when it surpasses the limit.
     
  3. Recoverable failure:
    Recoverable system failures occur when they fail to respond to any user's commands for some time. In such circumstances, the system will typically hang, not operate, and the screen may go blank. After a while, the system will attempt to remedy the issue, and the software will begin to function again.
     
  4. Unrecoverable failure:
    The most substantial hardware damage is frequently caused by unrecoverable software. When this software fails, it is unable to recover. Most of the time, they destroy hardware components or necessitate the system to be restarted, causing unpredictable behaviour in other ongoing apps. 
     
  5. Cosmic failure:
    The least harmful classification of software failures is cosmic. They don't seem to cause any issues with other software or hardware. They may cause minor inconveniences, such as causing the mouse to become stuck in one location for an extended period, and so on. In this form of software failure, no inaccurate results are provided.

FAQs

  1. What is hardware reliability?
    Physical failures are the most common type of hardware failure. Wear and tear are the most common causes of hardware failure. Design flaws can occur in hardware, although physical defects are more common.
     
  2. What is MTTF(Mean Time To Failure)?
    The MTTF is the average time between two consecutive failures. It is obtained by monitoring a significant number of software product failures. Failure data for n failures are recorded to calculate MTTF.
     
  3. What is ROCOF?
    ROCOF measures the frequency of failures. A software product's ROCOF measure can be obtained by observing its behaviour in operation over a particular time interval and duration. A ROCOF of 0.02 indicates that two failures are expected to occur per 100 operational time unit steps. The failure intensity metric is another name for it. As a result, ROCOF's application to a specific software product, such as payroll software, is quite limited.

Key Takeaways 

This article taught us about software reliability and different reliability metrics like the product, process, etc. We have also learned about software failure mechanisms and various types of software failures like a transient, permanent, and cosmic failure. We also infer from this article how vital it is to a software product's quality and performance.

We hope this article has helped you enhance your knowledge of Software reliability and failure mechanisms. Do upvote our blog to help other ninjas grow.

Head over to our practice platform Coding Ninjas Studio to practice top problems, attempt mock tests, read interview experiences, and much more!

Happy Reading!

Live masterclass