Ninja has been given a string ‘STR’ containing ‘(‘ and ‘)’. ‘STR’ may also contain lower case alphabets. In order to make ‘STR’ valid Ninja can remove either ‘)’ or ‘(’ from ‘STR’.
Here are some examples of valid ‘STR’ “((a))”, “(g)()”, “(())()”, "" (an empty string is also a valid string).
Ninja wants to know all the possible valid strings that can be formed from ‘STR’ by minimum possible removals (possibly zero).
Can you help Ninja to generate all valid strings from ‘STR’ by minimum removals?
For Example :For the given ‘STR’ = “()(()”, we can form a valid string “()()” by removing ‘(‘ at index 2 or 3.
The first line of input contains an integer 'T' which denotes the number of test cases or queries to be run. Then the test cases follow.
The first and the only line of each test case contains a string ‘STR’
Output Format :
For each test case, print all possible unique valid strings that can be formed from ‘STR’ in a separate line.
Print the output of each test case in a separate line.
Note :
You do not need to print anything; it has already been taken care of. Just implement the given function.
1 <= ‘T’ <= 100
‘STR[i]’ = ‘(‘, ‘)’ or Lower case english alphabet
1 <= |STR| <= 2000
Where |STR| denotes the length of the given string.
Time Limit: 1 sec
2
()())
()(x))()
()() (())
()(x)() ((x))()
For the first test case:
All the valid unique strings that can be formed from “()())” are “()()”, ”()”, ”(())”, ” ” among which “()()”, “(())” are formed from only 1 ‘)’ removal which is the minimum among all.
For the second test case:
All the valid unique strings that can be formed from “()(x))()” are “()(x)()”, ”()()”, ”(())”, ”((x))”, ”(x)”, ”(x)()”, ”((x))()”, ” ” among which ”((x))()” and “()(x)()” are formed from only 1 ‘)’ removal at index 1 and 5 respectively which takes the minimum removals among all possible valid strings.
2
))a((
(()s())
a
(()s())
For the first test case:
All the valid unique strings that can be formed from “))a((” are “a” and “” (empty string is also a valid string) in which “a” is formed from 2 ‘)’ removals at index 0 and 1 and 2 ‘(’ removal at index 3 and 4. which is the minimum among all possible valid strings.
For the second test case:
All the valid unique strings that can be formed from “ (()s())” are “()(s)()”, ”((())”, ”(s)”, ”(()s)”, ”(s())”, ”(()s())”, ” ”, ”s”, ”((s)), "()s()” among which "(()s())” is formed from 0 removals which is the minimum possible removals.
Try to use BFS to generate all valid strings
We are having three challenges in this problem: removing minimum parenthesis, generating valid strings and without any duplicates. We can solve this problem by using BFS because BFS guarantees the shortest path. Since the problem is to remove minimum parenthesis, we can think of using BFS. A straightforward approach is to remove a parenthesis from the current string until we get a valid string. It generates both duplicate and invalid strings. We can use a hash table to remove duplicates and check each string for validity.
Algorithm
We create a queue of type string for BFS, a hashmap of type string to handle the duplicates, and an array/list to store our final result. First, insert the given string ‘STR’ into the queue and do the following while the queue does not get empty.
O(|STR|*2^|STR|), where |STR| is the length of the string 'STR’.
Because in the worst case for every index we are removing the character at that index and inserting the remaining string into the queue. Then, for each string inside the queue we are checking if the string is valid or not which takes O(|STR|) time.
O(|STR|*|STR|), where |STR| is the length of the string 'STR’.
Because in the worst case the queue will contain all possible unique substrings formed from ‘STR’ and all these substrings are also mapped in the hash table.