You are given an array/list ‘ARR’ of size ‘N’. ‘ARR' is binary i.e. it contains only 0s and 1s (ARR[i] = {0, 1}). Your task is to find out the minimum number of swaps required to group all 1s together.
Note: If ‘ARR’ contains only 0’s then print -1.
Example:
Let ‘ARR’ = [ 0, 1, 0, 1]. We can group all 1s together in the following ways: ‘ARR’ =[0, 0, 1, 1] or ‘ARR’ = [0, 1, 1, 0].
In this example, we need only 1 swap to group all 1’s together which is the minimum possible.
The first line of input contains an integer ‘T’ which denotes the number of test cases.
The first line of each test case contains a single integer ‘N’ representing the number of elements in the array/list ‘ARR’.
The next line of each test case contains ‘N’ single space-separated integers (0s and 1s) denoting the elements of ‘ARR’.
Output Format :
For each test case, return the minimum number of swaps required to group all 1’s together.
Note:
You don't need to print anything, it has already been taken care of. Just implement the given function.
1 <= ‘T’ <= 100
2 <= ‘N’ <= 5000
0 <= ‘ARR[i]’ <= 1
Where ‘ARR[i]’ represents the elements of array/list ‘ARR’.
Time Limit: 1 sec
2
5
1 0 1 0 1
6
1 1 1 1 1 1
1
0
In test case 1, swap ‘ARR[1]’ and ‘ARR[4]’ (0-based indexing). Then ‘ARR’ = [1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. So, the minimum swaps to group all 1s together is 1.
In test case 2, all 1s are already together in 'ARR'. So, we don’t need any swaps. Hence, the minimum swaps to group all 1s together is 0.
2
4
0 0 0 0
6
1 1 0 0 1 1
-1
2
In test case 1, the number of 1s in 'ARR' is 0. So we return -1.
In test case 2, first, we swap ‘ARR[2]’ and ‘ARR[4]’ (0-based indexing). Now, ‘ARR’ = [1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1].
Then, swap ‘ARR[3]’ and ‘ARR[5]’. Now, ‘ARR’ = [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. So, the minimum swaps to group all 1s together is 2.
Count the number of 1s and 0s, using brute force.
First, we traverse through ‘ARR’ and count the number of 1s presents. We store the count in a 'COUNTONE' variable. If 'COUNTONE' is 0 then we simply return -1.
Else, we have to find a subarray of length 'COUNTONE', which contains maximum number 1's. We then need to swap all the 0s with 1s present in that subarray of length 'COUNTONE' as it will result in minimum possible swaps.
The steps are as follows:
O(N ^ 2), Where ‘N’ represents the number of elements in the array/list ‘ARR’.
We are using two nested loops for finding the maximum number of 1’s in subarrays of size ‘COUNTONE’ in ‘ARR’. There are ‘N’ - ‘COUNTONE’ + 1 subarrays of length ‘COUNTONE’, and we are iterating every such subarray to find the one with a maximum number of 1s. In the worst case, when ‘COUNTONE’ = N/2, the time complexity is O((N - N/2) * N/2) => O(N^2). Hence, the overall time complexity is O(N ^ 2).
O(1)
Since we are not using any extra space for finding our resultant answer. Thus the space complexity will be O(1).