Given a connected directed acyclic graph having ‘N’ nodes and ‘M’ edges. A matrix ‘edges’ of size M x 2 is given, which represents the ‘M’ edges such that there is an edge directed from node edges[i][0] to node edges[i][1].
You are supposed to find all possible paths from node 0 to node n - 1.
NoteNodes are numbered from 0 to N - 1.
The graph given is connected.
Print the path[][] in sorted order i.e path[i] is an array containing the path from 0 to n-1, and path[i] is lexicographically smaller than path[i + 1] then path[i] should appear before path[i + 1].
Assume we have two solutions
S1: A1 B1 C1 D1
S2: A2 B2 C2 D2
S1 is lexicographically smaller than S2 iff,
A1 < A2 OR
A1 = A2 AND B1 < B2 OR
A1 = A2 AND B1 = B2 AND C1 < C2 OR
A1 = A2 AND B1 = B2 AND C1 = C2 AND D1 < D2
For Example :
The following is an example of DAG i.e a directed graph with no cycles in it.

The first line contains a single integer ‘T’ denoting the number of test cases. The test cases are as follows.
The first line of each test case contains two integers separated by a single space,‘N’ and ‘M’, where ‘N’ denotes the number of the vertices and ‘M’ denotes the number of edges in the graph.
The next ‘M’ lines of each test case contain two integers ‘X’ and ‘Y’ separated by a single space, here ‘X’ and ’Y’ are the vertices connected by a directed edge from ‘X’ to ‘Y’.
Output Format :
For each test case, print all possible paths from node 0 to N - 1 in sorted order.
Print the output of each test case on a new line.
Note :
You don’t need to print anything; It has already been taken care of.
1 <= T <= 5
2 <= N <= 16
N-1 <= M <= N*(N - 1)/2
0 <= X,Y <= N - 1
Time Limit: 1 sec
2
6 5
0 1
0 2
2 5
3 4
4 2
5 6
0 1
2 1
1 4
2 4
0 4
3 1
0 2 5
0 1 4
0 4
For the first test case,
All possible paths from 0 to 5 are:
0 -> 2 -> 5
For the second test case,
All possible paths from 0 to 5 are:
0 -> 1 -> 4
0 -> 4
As the first path appears before so it is printed first and then the second path.
2
4 4
0 1
0 2
0 3
1 2
2 1
0 1
0 3
0 1
Can you think of some order which would cover the whole graph?
First of all, we know it is a directed acyclic graph, which means we do NOT need to keep track of previously seen nodes to avoid cycles.
We start our DFS from vertex 0, traverse for all adjacent vertices and push the current adjacent vertex to the path. After that, we call our DFS from the current adjacent vertex. After this, we remove the last added vertex from the path array.
The algorithm is as follows:
O(N * (2^N)), where N is the number of vertices in the graph.
In the worst case, when the given graph is a complete graph i.e for every 'i' there is an edge to 'j' for all j>i, the total number of paths can be of the order of 2^N, and we are exploring all possible paths and exploring each path will take O(N) time.
So the overall time complexity is O(N * (2^N)).
O(N + M), where N is the number of vertices and M is the number of edges in the graph.
Since we are using an array path[] to store the path from 0 to N-1 and the recursive call stack which can grow up to the order of N. Also we are storing the graph in the form of an adjacency list which will take O(M) space.
So, the overall space complexity is O(N+M).